Non-surgical and minimally invasive therapies have come a long way in the last decade, thanks to advances in technology that have reduced downtime and improved outcomes. Non-surgical body sculpting is no exception, and it shows no signs of slowing down now that a growing number of aesthetic companies are introducing their own fat-melting, fat-freezing products. While not all of these therapies are appropriate for everyone, some have been shown to be helpful in the correct circumstances.
Sifting through the distinctions between therapies, on the other hand, might be tough, which is why we did it for you. Continue reading to find out how CoolSculpting and EmSculpt differ.
SAFETY IN COOLSCULPTING VS. EMSCULPT
This is a stalemate! Both therapy methods have been authorized by the Food and Drug Administration. This implies that the FDA has determined that both therapies are safe and effective when administered by a trained professional. While CoolSculpting has been accessible for almost 5 years, the EmSculpt technology has been under development for over 2 years and has been proved safe and effective in seven clinical trials before being made available to the general public.
RESULTS OF COOLSCULPTING VS. EMSCULPT
EmSculpt is the only therapy that simultaneously develops muscle and burns fat. These treatments are usually performed 4-5 times over the course of two weeks. After 3-4 weeks, patients will see results and have the choice to continue treatments to preserve their outcomes. There isn’t a lot of information on maintenance therapies currently because this procedure is so new. EmSculpt is touted to reduce fat in the treatment region by up to 19 percent while simultaneously increasing muscle mass by 16 percent.
After a few weeks, CoolSculpting has been FDA-approved to eliminate up to 22 percent of fat in the treatment region. The introduction of numerous handpieces by CoolSculpting during the previous few years has given it a competitive advantage. This helps patients to lose fat in a variety of places, both large and tiny.
The outcomes of these two therapies are quite varied and difficult to compare. EmSculpt is the apparent victor for individuals aiming for a more shredded or torn look (and who are already pretty thin). CoolSculpting is the obvious victor when it comes to removing “pinch-able” rolls of fat. Most people, however, lie somewhere in the middle, and a doctor’s assessment of the underlying problems (skin, fat, or muscle) can help you decide which is the preferable option.
COMFORT IN COOLSCULPTING VS. EMSCULPT
Emsculpt is reported to be painless with no recovery time. There have been no reported side effects from the therapy thus far. Most patients will experience muscular pain the next day after treatment, much as you would after a hard workout. EmSculpt panels do not utilize hot or cold temperatures to remove fat or suction to keep them in place, making the procedure incredibly pleasant.
CoolSculpting uses a curved suction-based handpiece to destroy fat cells with freezing temperatures. Because of the low temperatures, some individuals feel numbness throughout the treatment. This numbness can be bothersome for some patients during and after treatment, but it is not unbearable. A new CoolSculpting CoolAdvantage system, on the other hand, has been introduced, promising more pleasant treatments with less tingling or numbness following the procedure.
Due to the lack of temperature fluctuations, EmSculpt appears to be the most pleasant therapy.
TIME COMMITMENT OF COOLSCULPTING VS. EMSCULPT
Depending on the size of the handpiece utilized, each CoolSculpting treatment cycle lasts 35-60 minutes. Some newer handpieces now offer treatment times of 35 minutes or less. For optimal results, most coolsculpting in Dubai clinics recommend two to six treatments spaced about one month apart. Emsculpt treatments take about 30 minutes and must be done in a series of four sessions spaced 2-3 days apart.
EmSculpt appears to be the winner in terms of time commitment, taking between 5 and 30 minutes every session.
DOWNTIME & SIDE EFFECTS OF COOLSCULPTING VS. EMSCULPT
For a few hours to days after CoolSculpting, patients will notice some redness and possibly a numbing sensation. If a patient is troubled by this, they may discover that their wardrobe options are limited. According to the company, EmSculpt has no physical side effects after treatment, although patients may experience muscular pain comparable to that experienced after a workout, which might vary in intensity based on the patient’s muscle mass.
This one is a toss-up based on what each patient values. While muscular pain and a numb treatment region are not significant side effects, they may be bothersome depending on a person’s lifestyle.
CANDIDATES & VERSATILITY IN COOLSCULPTING VS. EMSCULPT
Over the last several years, CoolSculpting has released many new handpieces to address smaller, more specific regions of the body. All of the handpieces, however, are rounded and function on fat that is “pinch-able” or “rolls.” Patients who are within 20 pounds of their target weight might consider CoolSculpting.
EmSculpt treats the belly or buttocks using flat panels that may be worn over clothing. There is some conflicting information about who is a candidate; the company claims that everyone who wants to lose weight and gain muscle mass is a candidate. Patients considering EmSculpt should not have a BMI greater than 25, according to RealSelf, for optimum outcomes.
CoolSculpting appears to be the more adaptable therapy because it can treat regions all over the body, whereas EmSculpt can only treat the belly and buttocks for now (though more treatment areas are on the horizon for FDA-Approval).
COST OF COOLSCULPTING VS. EMSCULPT
We’ll compare the prices for this treatment region solely because the abdomen is the only place where both therapies may be employed. The usual four-treatment procedure with EmSculpt will set you back $4000. Typically, 2-4 handpieces are used to cover both the upper and lower abdomen with CoolSculpting. These handpieces range in price from $750 to $1500. In all, plan to pay around $3,000 each session, with two sessions recommended for optimal results.
For the abdomen, Emsculpt is definitely less costly. However, it has quite different effects than CoolSculpting, making this a difficult comparison.
BOOK A CONSULTATION WITH REFLECTIONS.
If you’re interested in learning more about any of the body sculpting treatments available, we recommend making an appointment with a physician at Reflections Center. You will be able to ask your physician any questions you may have, receive feedback, and develop a treatment plan that is unique to you and your requirements during your appointment.